We're reminded daily about how change is coming, and to succeed in business, we must remain agile. That all makes sense in theory, but in practical application, to change how you operate or serve customers is no small feat.

影响, we've gone through quite a bit of change, going from a small core team to a good-sized agency. After努力实施a change to our client onboarding process, we decided to take a step back and re-evaluate our approach to change management.

立即下载:2021年启示状态[免费报告]

下面,我将与您分享我们审查的关键更改管理模型和工具,以及如何避免成为另一个统计数据。

为什么变更管理很重要?

A2019年Gartner研究revealed that most chief human resources officers are unhappy with the speed of change implementation in their organizations.

Why is that? Well, 80% of companies manage change from the top-down, according to the study. With this approach, leadership makes the calls, creates the plan, and sends instructions for company-wide rollout.

虽然这似乎是实施变更的最快方法,但从长远来看,它并不是最好的解决方案。

许多时候,领导层将员工归咎于失败的变化。但是,数据表明,大多数员工具有经历组织变革的技能和意愿。

问题在于决定谁是变更管理的战略,决策和实施一部分的一部分。

Today, companies are much more complex and for changes to be effective, they require more input across the organization. In other words, change management should be inclusive.

变革是恒定的,开发一个为您的业务工作的模型是您可以管理变革的人侧并为所有人准备成功的最佳方式。

4个常见变更管理模型

1. Kurt Lewin's Unfreeze-Change-Refreeze Model

Picture an ice cube.

Kurt Lewin's Unfreeze-Change-Refreeze model is exactly what it sounds like.

In the unfreeze stage, you are essentially breaking down the current way of doing business and noting what needs to change. It's crucial in this stage to obtain two-way feedback of what needs to change (vs. solely top-down).

After noting and communicating the need for change, gather the key stakeholders necessary to proactively implement what needs to be done.

一旦每个人都购买了“重新冻结”,以使变更制度化。

根据我们的经验,该模型比人更关注过程。如果您的团队较小,这可能是一个不错的选择。

2.ADKAR®变更模型

ADKAR®模型打破了管理变更的人类方面。

这个想法是您应该处理首字母缩写词的每个字母,重点关注公司内部的个人。bob全站app

Awareness。Here, the goal is to learn the business reasons for change. At the end of this stage, everyone should be on board.

Desire。This focuses on getting everyone engaged and willingly participating in the change. Once you have full buy-in, the next stage is measuring if the individuals in your company want to help and become part of the process.

知识。在这个阶段,您正在努力理解如何to change. This can come in the form of formal training or simple one-on-one coaching so those affected by the change feel prepared to handle it.

Ability。接下来,您必须专注于如何在所需的性能级别上实施更改。知道所需的工作技能仅仅是开始 - 需要在早期阶段得到支持,以确保他们可以纳入变化。

Reinforcement.最后,您需要维持的变化。这最后一个step is often the most missed. An organization needs to continually reinforce change to avoid employees from reverting back to the old way of doing things.

与Lewin的模型不同,这重点放在舞台的人们方面。我们喜欢它使用加固来使您的更改的想法,并且该模型将其进一步迈出了一步。

如果您有一个更大的团队或更复杂的问题,这是一种很好的方法。

3. Kotter's 8-Step Model of Change

在他的1995年书中Leading Change哈佛商学院教授约翰·科特(John Kotter)列出了八个阶段,所有公司必须经过有效的变更管理。

  1. 创建紧迫性通过公开对话,导致组织中的其他人希望像您一样多。
  2. Form a powerful coalition您组织中的变更代理。这可以超越领导能力。
  3. Create a vision for change加强其背后的原因以及实现最终结果的策略。
  4. Communicate the visionregularly to ease team anxiety and reinforce the "why."
  5. Remove obstaclesto pave the way for the needed changes to happen.
  6. 创造短期胜利to keep up morale and show the team you're moving in the right direction.
  7. Build on the change通过分析进展顺利的事情,并在快速胜利中取得不错的成绩,以继续推动最终结果。
  8. 锚定企业文化的变化作为标准的操作程序,请加强为什么需要更改,并将其作为公司文化的一部分。bob全站app

如果您有一个更敏捷的团队,则此模型的迭代过程与敏捷方法很好地同步。

4.金·斯科特(Kim Scott)完成的工作模型

好,所以也许这个不那么普遍yet, but it soon will be, so you might as well get ahead of the curve.

Kim Scott outlines the GSD model in her bestselling book,Radical Candor,以下过程:

  1. :倾听团队的想法,并创造一种彼此倾听的文化。
  2. 阐明: Make sure these ideas aren't crushed before everyone has a chance to understand their potential usefulness.
  3. Debate:创建一个可以批评,辩论和改善思想的环境。
  4. 决定:选择最能解决问题的想法。
  5. 说服: Since not everyone was involved in the listen-clarify-debate-decide stages, you have to effectively communicate why it was decided and why it's a good idea.
  6. 执行:实现这个想法。
  7. Learn: Learn from the results, whether or not you did the right thing, and start the whole process over again.

我们将其包括在Impact中,因为它专注于从一线获得想法。人们购买帮助创造的东西,而金·斯科特(Kim Scott)的GSD模型为实现这一目标提供了一个框架。

还有更多用于变革管理的模型,如果您像我们一样在Impact上,您可能会从每个模型中夺走一些有价值的东西,并找到最适合您公司的组合。bob全站app

Below is a real example of how my team approached a major change and the steps we took to ensure everyone was moving in the same direction.

1. Determine what needs to change and craft the message.

Over the course of three months, IMPACT completely restructured the agency-side of our organization. In March, our agency team looked like this:

更换管理层

This structure worked for us before, but as we came into a new year with an even larger team, our quarterly team survey results told us a different story.

这是几年来的第一次,并不是每个人都能看到自己的未来受到影响。

Some had no idea what was going on or why certain decisions had been made. And what stung the most is we had a few happiness scores below seven, which we haven't had since 2015.

哎哟。

In our February leadership team meeting, we debated for hours why some in the company were feeling this way.

经过几个想法,我们都确定了我们应该关注的一个领域是我们的结构。

我们正在为经理们设定竞争责任的失败。通过这样做,我们使他们很难与他们的团队有效沟通,在职业生涯中指导他们,并确保他们可以看到自己的未来。

The ones who did better in this area suffered in others, like client results and retention.

It was a huge issue that needed to be solved immediately.

这次领导团队会议是我们的变更管理计划中第1步的开始:确定需要改变和制作信息的内容。

在我们的领导团队会议之后,我们的每月一次会议中,我们的首席执行官鲍勃·鲁福洛(Bob Ruffolo)解释了我们决定背后的“为什么”。

他解释了调查结果,我们的思考过程以及导致对话的一切。

然后,他解释说,我们已经超越了当前的结构,对目前的经理承担了太多的责任。我们无意中设立了我们的团队失败,这还不行。

为了改善这种情况,我们需要创建一个扩展的结构。

种子进行改变只是第一步。在这次会议之后,我们知道会有恐惧和混乱,所以我们必须在第二步上工作。

2.确定您的利益相关者以及如何管理他们。

我们知道,如果严格地是一项自上而下的计划,完整的结构更改将无法顺利进行。我们需要帮助和核心联盟来使其脱颖而出。

However, not every single person would need to know every single detail of what was going on.

While all teams were involved, most were focused on how they would personally be affected in their day-to-day responsibilities and cross-functional work.

To keep communication clear and ensure everyone a chance to enact Kim Scott's debate stage, we had to identify stakeholders across the agency team.

In this case, our stakeholders were the team managers. We were essentially changing their job responsibility, so it was essential to include them in the conversation.

Although we created a committee of stakeholders, what we failed to do was take our communication a step further by managing the other agency team members more closely.

The matrix below outlines a way to segment your team and your communication with each segment so you can better communicate across the board.

我们只有我们的经理参与其中,我们每月一次都立即更新了团队的其他成员。下次,我们一定会根据此矩阵制定强大的沟通计划。

更改管理矩阵

Once we identified our key stakeholders, we met with each one and some of their teams to get their feedback, pushback, concerns, and ideas about the structure change.

In full transparency, not all these meetings were fun.

There was high emotion and rigorous debate. However, we had not zeroed in on our exact plan at this point. So, they helped us understand the team's concerns and ideate on the best way to structure for scale –一起。

3.系统地交流。

这是我们误会的领域。

在第一步中,我们在一家遇到一个令人震惊的想法的公司中宣布。bob全站app我们的经理觉得蒙蔽了双眼,并不是所有的团队成员都确信需要改变结构。

我们了解到,在公司会议上令人惊讶的人不是要走的路。bob全站app

Our intention was to be transparent about what was discussed in our leadership team meeting, but there was definitely a better way to do that.

识别后ifying key stakeholders, this is the path we believe is the best for disseminating information:

变更管理的沟通

经理可以以他们知道会产生共鸣并创造共同理解的风格与自己的团队进行交流。他们还可以帮助确定问题和疑虑,因此我们都可以共同创建解决方案。

这消除了集体思考,并减少了扑灭恐惧的时间表。

尽管我们的道路在这里有些混乱,但是一旦我们收到了所有团队反馈,我们都同意我们的新代理结构应该是什么:

变更管理策略

Then, we moved on to step four.

4. Get organized with incremental steps.

在this stage, everyone knew a change was coming, but no one knew how we were going to make it happen.

This was the time to get organized and get buy-in on the "how" of change management.

既然我们知道了我们的新结构,我们制定了一个项目计划,并采取了增量步骤,以便在本季度结束之前将我们带到那里。

We created a video explaining the structure and project plan for all teams to review in their weekly meetings.

Our managers and key stakeholders were involved and accountable for different parts of the plan, and in our all-hands meetings, we updated on the progress of the plan so everyone could stay informed.

在我们的计划中,我们还在第一个月绘制了一些“快速胜利”,因此团队可以感觉到正在发生重大进展。

在我们的案例中,这是为这些团队选择新的团队经理,他们的主要战略家搬到了另一支球队。

We interviewed internally and selected our new managers within three weeks of rolling out our initiative. This was exciting for our new managers and the team to see we were already making huge steps.

5. Equip your managers to handle teams' emotional responses to change.

拥有良好的沟通和扎实的计划真是太好了,但是归根结底,变化很难。

Everyone responds in their own way. What would have been helpful is knowing this concept of变化曲线

the change curve model

After our initial all-hands meeting, we had people all over the curve. We then, in essence, said, "Managers, figure it out!”

As we went through the process, we learned another lesson the hard way: We needed to adapt our communication and management style for each individual based on how they were responding to change.

The graphic below illustrates a concept by项目管理专家,这说明了如何在变化曲线上改变响应,以更快地获得买入,并为您的经理提供更好的教练。

image1-26

由会议团队成员在哪里,我们的人agers could adapt their communication style to coach each team member through the process, allowing for a more personalized, effective transition.

请记住,这不仅仅是对经理的建议。我们的团队在Scrum中运作,在他们的团队回顾展中,对该工具的共同理解可能会促进更强的对话和更好的解决问题。

6.由OKRS管理。

为了在整个季度保持专注,我们为我们的结构变化创建了一个目标和相应的关键结果(OKR)。

The objective was essentially "Make the structure change happen" and we measured by tracking the milestones from our project plan.

In every all-hands meeting, we updated the team on our efforts using a percentage chart so they could visualize our progress.

This was also a time for those working directly on the project plan to celebrate and give themselves a pat on the back. There was a ton of work involved, and they deserved to be recognized for crushing it.

By breaking down exactly what needed to happen, we were able to keep the team focused and motivated to reach our goal.

7.继续优先考虑沟通。

正如我在第一步中提到的那样,讨论这个想法仅仅是第一步。为了使每个人都有动力,组织和知情,我们必须进行交流a lot

我们专注于三种类型的交流:动机,信息和双向:

  • Our motivational communicationoften came from our CEO to reinforce the "why" behind this major change.
  • 信息沟通来自我们的全力以赴的OKR的最新信息,以及从事项目计划的团队的一次性视频以更新进度。
  • Two-way communicationwas (and is) arguably the most important one. We started off slow in this area, but after getting feedback in our Q2 team survey and from people on the team, we doubled down on this much more in the last month of the transition.

Aregular cadence of two-way communication means your team understands what's being shared, but you also learn and address if there's underlying dissent or miscommunication.

Although I put this as the last step, it's the most crucial.

沟通必须在整个倡议中进行,否则您将在此过程中遇到短暂而可能破坏的公司士气。bob全站app

如果您专注于上面的三种类型的交流,则可以通过更快乐的团队来更快地实现目标。

为什么变更管理很重要?

There is rarely a beginning and a clear-cut end like the more traditional models. I'm sure we'll discover more tweaks we need to get our structure right, and that's OK.

As a leader, you can choose a model, or a mix of models like what we do at IMPACT, to help organize effective, lasting change in your organization.

通过通过上面概述的交流方法合并团队,您可以授权并使您的团队采取行动,并为他们帮助做出的变化感到自豪。

编者注:该帖子最初于2018年11月发表,并已更新以进行全面性。

New call-to-action

New call-to-action

最初发布于2021年10月5日下午2:30:00,更新于2021年11月12日

主题:

Revenue Operations